Does atrial fibrillation status (new vs prior vs none) impact the risk of MACE and rehospitalisation in patients admitted with heart failure?
In patients admitted with heart failure, prior atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased adjusted risk of MACE, whereas new-onset atrial fibrillation is associated with a slightly lower adjusted risk compared to those without atrial fibrillation.
Background: Few studies comprehensively examine the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) status with rehospitalisation for adverse clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. Methods: Patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of HF between 1-July-2003 and 31-March-2021 were identified from the Australian New South Wales Admission-Patient-Data-Collection database and stratified by AF status (no-AF vs new-AF vs prior-AF) (end-of-follow-up: 31-March-2022). Multivariable Cox regression and Fine-Gray competing risk methods were used to assess the association of AF status with risk of MACE/all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation for non-fatal outcomes respectively. MACE was defined as all-cause mortality, admission for myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, HF or coronary revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery), whichever occurred first. Results: The cohort comprised 152,638 admitted HF patients (median age: 80.4 years; 51.4 % males): 10.7 % New-AF; 37.0 % Prior-AF. During a median 1.24 years follow-up, compared to no-AF HF patients, new-AF and prior-AF patients had significantly higher rates of MACE (no-AF:78.5 % vs new-AF:81.7 % vs prior-AF:86.3 %) (both logrank P < 0.001). However, after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and admission year-groups, new-AF and prior-AF status had differential impact on MACE compared to no-AF patients (adjusted hazard ratio aHR = 0.93, 95 % confidence interval CI = 0.91-0.94; aHR = 1.14, 95 %CI = 1.13-1.16 respectively; both P < 0.001); results were similar for all-cause death. Rehospitalisation risk for most non-fatal clinical outcomes were significantly higher in HF patients with new-AF and prior-AF. Conclusion: This study shows AF status has a differential impact on clinical outcomes in patients admitted with HF. Drivers behind these differences require further elucidation.
Ne et al. (Tue,) studied this question.