Pulsed-field ablation in patients over 75 years showed 81.4% freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 6 months, comparable to younger patients (83.8%, p = 0.57).
Does pulsed-field ablation have comparable safety and efficacy in patients >75 years compared to patients ≤75 years with atrial fibrillation?
Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation appears safe and effective in patients over 75 years old, with outcomes comparable to younger patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
ABSTRACT Background Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), but older patients remain underrepresented in clinical trials. This study aimed to compare procedural outcomes and mid‐term effectiveness of PFA in patients aged ≤ 75 and > 75 years. Methods In this retrospective single‐center cohort, 479 consecutive patients underwent PFA for AF between January 2022 and April 2024. Patients were grouped by age (≤ 75 vs. > 75 years at ablation). Procedural parameters and acute complications were compared. Arrhythmia‐free survival was assessed with Kaplan–Meier analysis after an 8‐weeks blanking period, and predictors of recurrence were evaluated using Cox regressions. Results Of 479 patients (mean age 65.0 ± 12.1 years; 73.6% males), 104 (21.7%) were > 75 years at ablation. Patients > 75 years had more comorbidities, including hypertension and impaired renal function. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 99.8% of cases. Acute complication rates were similar between groups (7.7% in > 75 vs. 8.5% in ≤ 75, p = 1.00), with low rates of tamponade (1.5%) and stroke (1.3%). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no difference in arrhythmia‐free survival. At 6 months, freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 81.4% in the > 75 group and 83.8% in the ≤ 75 group ( p = 0.57); corresponding rates at 12 months were 60.1% and 68.6%. Age was not an independent predictor of recurrence. At last follow‐up, 75.7% of patients were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Conclusions PFA in patients > 75 years is associated with low complication rates and favorable rhythm outcomes, comparable to those in younger patients. These findings support the use of PFA in elderly patients with AF.
Follesa et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Pulsed-field ablation in patients over 75 years showed 81.4% freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 6 months, comparable to younger patients (83.8%, p = 0.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: