Transvenous CIED leads in CTEPH patients can harbor silent thrombi, and their extraction with epicardial conversion during pulmonary endarterectomy represents a comprehensive surgical approach to eliminate future thrombotic sources.
1/3Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the definitive curative therapy for operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). 1 The operation requires meticulous removal of organized fibrotic obstruction together with the diseased intima from the pulmonary arteries.This highly technical procedure offers the possibility of restoring near-normal pulmonary hemodynamics.However, even with successful removal of obstructive material, long-term outcomes depend not only on what is taken out but also on what remains.Among residual contributors to thromboembolic risk, transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads have emerged as a clinically important but often under-recognized factor.In this issue of the Right Heart Journal, Nemoto et al. 2 report a concise and valuable case series involving 9 CTEPH patients with transvenous CIED systems who underwent simultaneous lead extraction and epicardial lead implantation during PEA.Although these 9 cases represent only about 1 percent of the center's 880 operated patients, the clinical implications extend well beyond the size of the cohort.Their findings prompt a renewed examination of how intravascular pacing hardware contributes to disease progression and how its management should be integrated into surgical planning.Growing evidence indicates that intravascular pacing leads are associated with a substantial thrombotic burden.Autopsy and imaging studies reveal thrombi near pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in up to one-third of patients. 3Mobile lead thrombi have been associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressures, suggesting a direct impact on right ventricular load and pulmonary vascular resistance. 4Specific to CTEPH, Nayak et al. 5 identified a greater burden of distal disease among CIED carriers, despite fewer documented venous thromboembolic events.This observation supports the concept that transvenous leads may act as a chronic nidus for small, recurrent emboli that accumulate in the distal pulmonary circulation.Nemoto et al. 2 add essential clinical evidence by showing organized thrombus adherent to extracted leads in 5 of 9 patients.Notably, in one case, preoperative imaging failed to detect the thrombus, and it was identified only during surgery.This reinforces an important clinical reality.Lead-associated thrombosis may be completely silent and radiographically occult, and cannot be reliably excluded by routine preoperative imaging in CTEPH candidates.
Dae Hee Kim (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: