Heart rate variability features within 24 hours after pediatric cardiac arrest can predict unfavorable outcomes with an AUROC of 0.80.
Can machine learning models using heart rate variability features within 24 hours of return of spontaneous circulation predict unfavorable neurological outcomes in children after cardiac arrest?
Machine learning models utilizing heart rate variability features within 24 hours of return of spontaneous circulation can effectively predict unfavorable neurological outcomes in pediatric cardiac arrest survivors, without needing additional clinical variables.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
AIMS: Heart rate variability (HRV), a non-invasive measure of autonomic function, may offer prognostic value after pediatric cardiac arrest. We used machine learning models to determine whether HRV features within the first 24 hours after return of spontaneous circulation can predict outcomes in children following cardiac arrest, and whether adding clinical cardiac arrest characteristics improves model performance. METHODS: Retrospective study of children who received post-arrest care in the PICU at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from 2020 to 2023. Thirty-six HRV features were extracted from ECG recordings and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) models were trained to predict unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category 4-6 and an increase >1 from baseline. Models were evaluated by cross-validation across the entire 24-hour period and within sequential 6-hour epochs. Additional models included clinical arrest characteristics. Performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Of the 75 patients who met inclusion criteria (median age 6.8 IQR 10.4 years), 51% had an unfavorable outcome. Model considering HRV features and age models achieved an AUROC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88). Top HRV predictors included standard deviation (SDNN), power at very low and low frequency bands, entropy, and fractal scaling. Performance was similar across the 6-hour epochs (p's>0.1). Adding cardiac arrest characteristics did not improve model performance (AUROC 0.83 0.73-0.92, p>0.41). CONCLUSION: Using machine learning, HRV features within 24 hours after pediatric cardiac arrest predict unfavorable outcome with AUROC 0.8. Adding clinical variables did not improve model performance.
Silva et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Heart rate variability features within 24 hours after pediatric cardiac arrest can predict unfavorable outcomes with an AUROC of 0.80.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: