Why the study?
Optimal patient outcomes with oral selexipag require careful titration and side effect management, prompting expert consensus on appropriate management.
Expert consensus highlights the importance of individualized titration and proactive side effect management to optimize oral selexipag therapy in patients with PAH.
Supports individualized selexipag titration in PAH to improve tolerability; extends expert consensus into actionable clinical guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Oral selexipag, a prostacyclin receptor agonist, has been shown to delay pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) progression and reduce the risk of hospitalization for PAH. To ensure optimal patient outcomes with selexipag, careful treatment titration and expected side effect (SE) management are required. This study aimed to obtain expert consensus on the appropriate management of patients with PAH treated with selexipag. METHODS: United States (US) healthcare professionals (N = 17, 11 physicians; 5 nurse practitioners; 1 registered nurse) participated in this modified-Delphi panel comprising two online surveys and a consensus meeting. Consensus was defined as ≥80% panelists agreeing using a 9-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Panelists prescribed selexipag according to FDA label recommendations to patients with PAH. Panelists acknowledged considerations prompting adjustment in titration speed, agreeing that individual maximum dose is based on SE tolerability. It was agreed that the duration of SEs is variable and patient-specific, however, SEs often become manageable over time. Panelists identified methods for managing SEs, agreeing this should be proactive. Panelists highlighted the importance of communicating with patients to set expectations, to enhance engagement and adherence. Panelists agreed that treatment initiation, titration, and SE management should be individualized to suit each patient, with decision-making primarily based on patient characteristics and treatment preference. DISCUSSION: This panel provided expert opinions on the clinical use of and best practices for treatment titration and management of expected SEs for oral selexipag. Insights are valuable for developing standardized clinical guidelines and best practices, as well as ensuring personalized treatment to improve patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: