Key result
Frailty linked to ~31-fold higher all-cause mortality risk in PRISm individuals.
Why the study?
PRISm is associated with elevated CVD risk and progression to COPD, but underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and the role of frailty in PRISm has not been well defined.
Is frailty associated with increased cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in adults with preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm)?
Is frailty associated with increased cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in adults with preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm)?
Frailty is highly prevalent in individuals with PRISm and serves as a strong, independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events and long-term mortality.
May support frailty screening for mortality risk stratification in PRISm; leaves open whether modification improves outcomes.
Background Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is associated with elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and progression to COPD, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Frailty is known to worsen outcomes in COPD; however, its role in PRISm has not been well defined. This study examined factors associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in PRISm and developed risk models. Methods We analyzed 8882 adults (aged 20–79 years) from NHANES 2007–2012, identifying 763 (8.6%) with PRISm (FEV 1 /FVC ≥ 0.70 and FEV 1 < 80% predicted). Frailty was assessed using the 23‐item laboratory frailty index (FI‐LAB; cut‐off ≥ 0.23). The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality, obtained from linked National Death Index records; the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or angina), assessed cross‐sectionally. LASSO regression and multivariable logistic/Cox models were used to identify variables independently associated with the outcomes, and nomograms were constructed. Results PRISm participants had higher frailty prevalence (53.9% vs. 45.5%) and more MACEs (16.2% vs. 6.0%) than those with normal spirometry (both p < 0.0001). Frailty was independently associated with prevalent MACEs (adjusted OR = 18.87, p < 0.001) and was bidirectionally associated with PRISm (OR = 1.40, p < 0.001). Key factors independently associated with MACEs included frailty index, age, sex, anemia, and emphysema (AUC = 0.786). Over 9.9 years, mortality was higher in frail vs. non‐frail PRISm individuals (15.2% vs. 7.0%; adjusted HR = 30.66). Frailty severity demonstrated a clear mortality gradient, and a mortality nomogram integrating age and frailty achieved an AUC of 0.81. Conclusion Frailty is strongly and independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. FI‐LAB offers a practical tool for risk stratification and may help guide targeted preventive strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2026) studied this question. Frailty significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality in PRISm individuals, with an adjusted HR of 30.66 over 9.9 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: