Key result
Fetal echocardiography shows no added diagnostic value for significant CHD in pregnancies with familial BAV.
Why the study?
The diagnostic yield of fetal echocardiography in detecting significant CHD was unclear in pregnancies with a normal obstetric ultrasound and family history of BAV.
Does fetal echocardiography improve the detection of significant congenital heart disease in pregnancies with a first-degree relative with bicuspid aortic valve and a normal obstetric ultrasound?
Does fetal echocardiography improve the detection of significant congenital heart disease in pregnancies with a first-degree relative with bicuspid aortic valve and a normal obstetric ultrasound?
Fetal echocardiography provides no added diagnostic value for detecting significant congenital heart disease in pregnancies with a first-degree relative with bicuspid aortic valve and a normal obstetric ultrasound, suggesting a need for more targeted screening.
May not warrant routine fetal echocardiography in this setting; leaves open the need for prospective studies to refine risk-based screening.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of fetal echocardiography (f-Echo) in detecting significant congenital heart disease (CHD) in pregnancies with a first-degree relative with a history of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and a normal level II obstetric ultrasound. A retrospective review was conducted of all f-Echos performed between 2019 and 2023 for the sole indication of family history of BAV. Cases with additional indications or affected nonfirst-degree relative were excluded. Postnatal transthoracic echocardiography (t-Echo) data were reviewed when available. Significant CHD was defined as requiring catheter or surgical intervention in the first year of life. Sixty-five f-Echos were included (mean gestational age: 26.6 ± 3.7 weeks). No significant CHD was identified prenatally. Postnatal t-Echo was performed in 41 (63%) cases, with no significant CHD detected. Two (5%) infants were diagnosed postnatally with BAV, neither requiring intervention during the study interval. Minor findings included one case each of pulmonary valve stenosis and atrial septal defect. In pregnancies with a first-degree relative with BAV and a normal obstetric ultrasound, f-Echo showed no added diagnostic value for detecting significant CHD. Based on the state's birth rate (approximately 35,000/year), BAV prevalence (1–2%), and an average family size of 3.08, an estimated 733 to 1,466 pregnancies annually in Arkansas could qualify for f-Echo under current guidelines. At a cost of $1,000 to 5,000 per study, this translates to an annual healthcare expenditure ranging from $733,000 to 7.33 million. These findings support more targeted screening and the need for multicenter studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2025) studied this question. Fetal echocardiography showed no added diagnostic value for detecting significant congenital heart disease in pregnancies with a first-degree relative with bicuspid aortic valve.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: