Key result
Anchoring HIIT to critical power increases workload but fails to reduce blood lactate variability versus HRmax.
Why the study?
Anchoring HIIT intensity to maximal heart rate elicits wide metabolic variability, which anchoring to critical power may reduce.
Does high-intensity interval training anchored to critical power reduce the variability in blood lactate response compared to training anchored to maximal heart rate in healthy active adults?
Does high-intensity interval training anchored to critical power reduce the variability in blood lactate response compared to training anchored to maximal heart rate in healthy active adults?
Anchoring high-intensity interval training to critical power does not reduce the variability of acute blood lactate responses compared to traditional maximal heart rate anchoring, though it elicits higher workloads and greater cardiorespiratory stress.
HIIT anchored to critical power does not reduce blood lactate variability versus heart rate; challenges assumptions about metabolic threshold guidance for training consistency.
High intensity interval training (HIIT) involves repeated bouts of relatively hard work, commonly at intensities eliciting ≥ 80% of maximal heart rate (HRmax), interspersed with recovery periods. Anchoring intensity to HRmax can elicit a wide range of acute metabolic responses to exercise. Expressing intensity relative to metabolic thresholds such as critical power (CP) may reduce this variability. We therefore examined whether anchoring HIIT to CP reduced variability in change in [blood lactate] (ΔBLa−) compared to HRmax-based approach. Nineteen adults aged 23 ± 4 years completed two 4 × 4-min HIIT trials in a randomized, crossover manner at intensities equal to CP + 10% of work prime (CPHIIT) or ≥ 80% HRmax (HRHIIT). Variability in [ΔBLa−] from rest to exercise was not different between CPHIIT and HRHIIT (1.37 (0.42–1.62) vs. 1.32 (0.77–1.97) mM; p = 0.75). Workload was higher in CPHIIT vs. HRHIIT (192 ± 39 W vs. 180 ± 43 W; p = 0.001), as was exercise oxygen consumption, ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (all p < 0.05). A CP-based HIIT protocol did not reduce variability of change in [ΔBLa−] compared to a traditional approach anchored to %HRmax. However, anchoring HIIT intensity to CP resulted in participants achieving higher workloads, eliciting higher cardiorespiratory and perceived stress which could translate to divergent training-induced responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bone et al. (2025) studied this question. Anchoring HIIT to critical power resulted in higher workloads (192 W vs. 180 W) and greater cardiorespiratory stress but did not reduce blood lactate variability compared to HRmax.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: