Key result
Early surgery for infective endocarditis does not increase 1-year death or reoperation vs. later surgery.
Why the study?
Does early surgical intervention improve prognosis in patients with infective endocarditis?
Cohort (n=166)
No
Does early surgical intervention improve prognosis in patients with infective endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.8% vs 3.4%
p-value: p=0.665
Early surgical intervention for infective endocarditis does not increase mortality or recurrence risk, supporting early surgery in patients with clear indications before completing a full cycle of antibiotics.
Early surgery was not associated with higher 1-year risks in this cohort; leaves open optimal timing in infective endocarditis.
BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a disease caused by the involvement of pathogenic microorganisms in the endocardium, primarily characterized by the formation of growths and progressive valve damage. Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, the mortality rate remains high. Conventional treatment typically favors surgery after 4-6 weeks of infection control. Although a series of articles on early surgical treatment have been published in recent years, outcomes for early surgical treatment continue to vary. METHODS: By collecting the clinical data of 166 patients who underwent cardiac surgery for IE between February 1, 2017, and January 31, 2023, we classified the patients into three groups: Group A (radical surgery within 1-7 days after admission), Group B (surgical treatment 8-13 days after admission), and Group C (surgical treatment 14-28 days after admission) according to different treatment strategies. To compare the effects of different times of surgical intervention on the early prognosis of patients, logistic multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with surgical mortality, and the survival of different groups of patients was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in perioperative reinfarction, endocarditis recurrence, heart failure, or in-hospital mortality among the three treatment groups. However, ICU length of stay (P=0.015, 1.30 [1.05-1.61]), cardiac malfunction (P=0.015, 22.28 [1.82-273.04]), and other organ malfunctions (P=0.007, 29.21 [2.46-346.49]) were identified as risk factors affecting patient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical intervention did not increase the risk of death in patients with IE, nor did it increase the risk of recurrence and reoperation within one year. Therefore, we recommend early surgical intervention before completing a cycle of antibiotics in patients with a clear diagnosis, unstable cardiac function, or risk of recurrent embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Infective endocarditis (n=166). Early surgical intervention (1-7 days after admission) vs. Late surgical intervention (14-28 days after admission) was evaluated on Postoperative death or reoperation within 1 year (p=0.665). Early surgical intervention within 1-7 days of admission did not significantly increase the risk of death or reoperation within 1 year compared to later surgery in patients with infective endocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: