Key result
Only ~37% of Latin American physicians request Lp(a) testing, primarily limited by cost and availability.
Cross-Sectional (n=512)
Yes
Awareness and clinical use of Lp(a) testing among Latin American physicians remain limited, highlighting a need for improved accessibility and clearer guidelines to enhance cardiovascular risk assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low Lp(a) testing uptake signals access barriers for clinicians; leaves open whether improved availability and guidelines would refine risk assessment.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In Latin America (LATAM), the level of awareness and clinical implementation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) testing among physicians remain largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, frequency of use, and clinical management practices related to Lp(a) among LATAM physicians. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, 36-item Spanish-language online survey using convenience sampling through medical societies in twenty LATAM countries. All items were mandatory. The questionnaire included two sections based on whether respondents requested Lp(a) testing and explored barriers among nonusers. RESULTS: A total of 512 physicians from various LATAM countries responded, with Mexico representing 75.4% of the participants. Overall, 36.7% of the physicians reported currently requesting Lp(a) testing, primarily in patients with premature cardiovascular diseases (CVD), familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), or recurrent events despite low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) at goal. Among those never ordering Lp(a) testing, the main barriers were lack of availability (57.4%) and high cost (33.6%). Knowledge gaps were identified: Only half of the respondents correctly identified Lp(a) risk thresholds or LDL-C targets. Despite this, most physicians who ordered the Lp(a) test reported taking active measures such as intensifying lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) (90%) and intensifying the management of other CV risk factors (68%) if Lp(a) was > 50 mg/dL or 125 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness and clinical use of Lp(a) testing among LATAM physicians remain limited and focused on high-risk scenarios. Improving test accessibility, providing clearer clinical guidelines, and reinforcing the evidence for Lp(a) as a therapeutic target may enhance its adoption and integration into cardiovascular risk assessment across the region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz‐Bautista et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Physicians' knowledge and practice regarding Lp(a) testing (n=512). Lipoprotein(a) testing awareness and clinical practice was evaluated on Proportion of physicians currently requesting Lp(a) testing. Among 512 surveyed Latin American physicians, only 36.7% reported currently requesting lipoprotein(a) testing, primarily limited by lack of availability and high cost.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: