Non-English speaking patients had similar time to surgery and length of stay as English speakers despite poorer baseline medical conditions.
Does primary language affect patient time to surgery following hip fractures in patients >55 years?
Despite poorer baseline medical conditions, non-English speaking patients received similar care to English speakers regarding time to surgery and length of stay for hip fracture repair.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
The purpose of this study was to assess whether language affects patient time to surgery following hip fractures. Patients >55 years who underwent operative hip fracture repair between 2014 and 2021 were reviewed for demographics, language, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were split into English (E) or non-English (NE) cohorts based on their primary language. A total of 1880 patients (1477 E, 403 NE) were included. The E cohort was younger, had lower body mass index, and lower American Society of Anesthesiology Score ( P .05). Despite poorer baseline medical conditions, NE speaking patients received similar care to English speakers highlighting the importance of an effective standardized protocol with readily available translation services. Level III, Retrospective cohort study. Keywords: hip fracture, primary language, english, time to surgery, outcomes
Bloom et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Non-English speaking patients had similar time to surgery and length of stay as English speakers despite poorer baseline medical conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: