Dynamical optimization reveals phase transitions in combinatorial optimization, suggesting breakthroughs in solving SAT problems.
ShunyaBar: Differentiable Combinatorial Optimization using Arithmetic Symmetry Breaking ShunyaBar is a dynamical optimization framework grounded in non-commutative geometry and quantum statistical mechanics. The system is formalized as a spectral triple (A, H, D) encoding the arithmetic and geometric structure of the SAT phase space. The associated partition function factorizes over the adèlic ring AQ as: Z(β) = ζ(β) · Tr(e-β L) where ζ(β) is the Riemann zeta function and L is the constraint graph Laplacian. Core Mechanism We prove that the corresponding Kubo–Martin–Schwinger (KMS) states undergo a phase transition at inverse temperature βc = 1, exhibiting full one-step Replica Symmetry Breaking (1-RSB). Applied to combinatorial optimization—such as random 3-SAT near the critical density α ≈ 4.26—a quasi-static Renormalization Group (RG) sweep across βc = 1 produces dramatic speedups. These are bounded only by the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, rather than by exponential search. Method Summary ShunyaBar does not perform combinatorial search. Instead, it: Continuously relaxes Boolean constraints into a global dynamical system. Destroys illegal regions of state space by making them energetically unstable. Forces a phase transition via an arithmetic singularity at β = 1. Freezes into a discrete Boolean assignment once full satisfaction is achieved. Terminates immediately upon reaching 100% satisfaction (no repair phase). This approach replaces backtracking and clause learning with global consistency enforcement. Performance & Industrial Benchmarks SAT 2024 Industrial Track Navokoj (the implementation of ShunyaBar) achieved a 92.57% perfect solution rate on the SAT 2024 industrial benchmarks (4,199 problems), tested across three engines: Engine Perfect Rate Speed Quality Use Case PRO 92.57% 7.9/sec 99.92% Mission-critical MINI 31.37% 10.6/sec 99.55% Balanced NANO 3.24% 12/sec 96.41% Real-time Case Study 1: 129-SAT (Ultra-High-k Regime) Problem: N=200, M=10⁶, Alpha ≈ 5000 (1000x over-constrained). Challenge: Locality is destroyed; CDCL search is ineffective as clause learning loses meaning. Result: 100% satisfaction (0/1M violated) in ~9–10 minutes on a single H100 GPU. Case Study 2: Ramsey R(5,5,5) at N = 52 Problem: Construct a 3-edge-coloring of K₅₂ with no monochromatic K₅ subgraphs. Search space: 3¹³²⁶ ≈ 10⁶³³. Result: Perfect 3-coloring found in ~17 minutes. This constitutes a constructive lower bound for $R(5,5,5)$. Comparison: ShunyaBar vs. NVIDIA TurboSAT Aspect NVIDIA TurboSAT ShunyaBar Core approach Gradient-guided search + CDCL Pure continuous dynamics Uses CDCL Yes (CPU side) No Repair phase Required None Handles High-k Not targeted Native Proof output CDCL certificates Boolean witness + verifier While TurboSAT offloads exploration to GPUs to accelerate classical SAT, ShunyaBar eliminates search entirely, operating in regimes where CDCL ceases to be meaningful. Verification & Reproducibility Instance Type Size Satisfaction Rate Status 129sat_n200 129-SAT N=200, M=10⁶ 100.00% Verified pyth_n5000 Pythagorean $N=5000$ 100.00% Verified ramsey_n52 Ramsey K₅₂, R(5,5,5) 100.00% Verified 3sat_100k 3-SAT $N=23k$ 94.90% Partial To verify these results independently: python3 verify_reproducibility.py This script scans the results/ directory, regenerates instances using deterministic generators, and verifies all assignments. ShunyaBar replaces combinatorial search with arithmetic-spectral phase transitions, enforcing global consistency to produce verifiable witnesses in regimes where classical solvers fail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sethurathienam Iyer (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: