PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Robotic Horizons in Plastic Surgery: A Look Toward the Future

View Full Paper
AFAli ForoutanDPDiwakar PhuyalCleveland ClinicGBGeorgia BabbCleveland Clinic

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the current state and future potential of robotic technology in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
  • Literature review of studies reporting robot-assisted procedures in plastic surgery
  • Thematic synthesis of findings on procedural applications and emerging technologies
  • Identification of areas requiring further clinical investigation
  • Robotic systems reported in flap harvest, breast reconstruction, craniofacial reconstruction, and head and neck reconstruction
  • Current evidence primarily consists of case series with limited comparative outcomes
  • Need for standardized reporting and long-term prospective studies highlighted

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robotic technology has transformed several surgical specialties, offering enhanced precision, visualization, and dexterity. In plastic and reconstructive surgery, robotic systems are increasingly utilized across a range of procedures, though their applications remain in early development. Methods: A review of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting robot-assisted procedures in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The literature was synthesized thematically to characterize current procedural applications, emerging technologies, and areas of active clinical investigation. Results: Robotic systems have been reported in a broad range of plastic and reconstructive procedures, including flap harvest, microsurgery, breast reconstruction, craniofacial and head and neck reconstruction, esthetic surgery, and gender-affirming surgery. The existing studies primarily consist of case series and case reports with substantial variability in reported indications, techniques, and technological platforms. Comparative clinical outcomes and long-term data are limited. Conclusions: Robot-assisted reconstruction continues to expand across multiple procedural domains. However, current evidence remains largely descriptive, underscoring the need for standardized reporting and prospective studies to better define clinical value, safety, and appropriate indications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Foroutan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e70e13bf7a6f02bff3d6https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020602
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper