Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates protease-activated receptors and their impact on survival and treatment efficacy in colorectal cancer, suggesting potential prognostic markers.
213 Background: Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are G-protein-coupled receptors activated by thrombin and tissue factor (TF)-VIIa complexes. In colorectal cancer (CRC), TF promotes thrombosis, tumor progression, and therapy resistance in part through PAR signaling. We evaluated expression of F2R (PAR-1), F2RL1 (PAR-2), F2RL2 (PAR-3), and F2RL3 (PAR-4) and their associations with prognosis and treatment outcomes in CRC. Methods: PAR gene expression was analyzed using data from 433 metastatic CRC patients in CALGB/SWOG (Alliance) 80405 who received first-line chemotherapy with either bevacizumab (n = 226) or cetuximab (n = 207). RNA was extracted from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina). Patients were stratified into tertiles or quartiles by gene expression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using multivariate Cox models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, ECOG status, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS/MSI status, and treatment arm. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Log-rank p-values were used for unadjusted comparisons. Fisher’s exact and chi-square tests assessed categorical associations; FDR-adjusted significance was defined as Q < 0.05. Results: High PAR-3 expression was associated with improved OS (35.9 vs. 24.9 months; HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.90; p = 2e-04, FDR < 0.05). A survival benefit was also seen with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (36.1 vs. 25.2 months; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70–0.94; p = 0.0059) and trended toward improved OS with cetuximab (35.8 vs. 22.1 months; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67–1.00; p = 0.051). High PAR-1 expression was associated with inferior PFS (10.0 vs. 11.9 months; HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03–1.29; p = 0.014) and trended toward worse OS (26.5 vs. 35.8 months; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.98–1.25; p = 0.091). This effect was particularly evident with chemotherapy plus cetuximab (26.0 vs. 37.1 months; HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12–1.68; p = 0.0019). High PAR-4 expression trended toward worse PFS (10.2 vs. 11.3 months; HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00–1.21; p = 0.058) and OS (27.7 vs. 30.7 months; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.24; p = 0.061). High PAR-2 expression was not significantly associated with OS (29.0 vs. 29.4 months; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84–1.04; p = 0.23). Conclusions: High PAR-3 expression was associated with significantly prolonged OS and may serve as an independent prognostic biomarker in CRC. Associations with improved outcomes with bevacizumab suggest a potential link between PAR-3 signaling and angiogenic pathways. In contrast, high PAR-1 expression correlated with inferior PFS and significantly worse outcomes with cetuximab, potentially reflecting interaction with mechanisms of EGFR resistance. These findings support further investigation of TF-PAR signaling in CRC to clarify these mechanisms and assess their therapeutic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerniglia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: