Chinese enterprises have become increasingly active in Kyrgyzstan under the Belt and Road Initiative, bringing investment, technology, and managerial expertise. Despite these advantages, many firms struggle to sustain productivity due to cultural misalignments. This paper investigates how differences in authority structures, incentive systems, communication styles, and time orientations affect efficiency in cross-cultural enterprises. Drawing on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, Trompenaars’ model, and Hall’s context theory, the study analyzes six cases in mining, manufacturing, infrastructure, e-commerce, energy, and services. The findings show that hierarchical rigidity, collective reward schemes, unclear procedures, and standardized service models often reduce motivation, trust, and performance. Productivity was improved, however, when firms adopted hybrid strategies—such as participatory mechanisms, dual incentives, structured workflows, modular training, and personalized service interactions. These results highlight that productivity in international enterprises is not purely technical but culturally embedded. The study contributes to cross-cultural management by linking cultural dimensions directly to organizational efficiency and extends the scope of research to Central Asia. For practitioners, it emphasizes that cultural awareness and adaptation are strategic resources for sustaining competitiveness abroad.
Tianze et al. (Fri,) studied this question.