Tool provides structural classification for critical infrastructure, suggesting governance strategies for runaway-prone systems.
This record provides a standalone Runaway-Regime Diagnostic Tool for rapid structural classification of high-risk complex systems (e.g., frontier AI, critical infrastructure, financial systems, and other runaway-prone domains). The tool is derived directly from the formal framework presented in: Dellomonaco, D. (2026). Runaway Dynamics, Asymmetric Control, and Governance Bifurcations (Zenodo). It introduces no new theoretical claims and does not prescribe specific policy instruments. Instead, it provides a regime-based diagnostic (benign / critical / catastrophic) and a concise checklist to determine when continuous (“soft”) governance is structurally sufficient and when prepared hard controls become a mandatory safety mode. An appendix illustrates the application to frontier AI systems (status: January 2026) in strictly structural terms, without system-specific allegations. The intent is to support decision-makers in performing regime diagnosis prior to debates on cost, ethics, or political feasibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davide Dellomonaco (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: