Background/Objectives: Considering that the kinematics of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) is concomitant with head movements and that temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are frequently associated with neck pain in clinics but seldom or never investigated, the aim of this study was to develop a reliable in vivo measurement protocol of the simultaneous amplitudes of the mandible and of the skull. The development of such a protocol is part of a project to build an accurate kinematic assessment tool for clinicians in the orofacial field who treat patients suffering from TMD. Methods: Mouth opening, laterotrusion and protrusion movements for three different positions of the head (neutral, slouched and military) on 12 asymptomatic voluntary subjects (5 men and 7 women, mean 33.6 yo +/− 11.1) were recorded using 20 markers palpated and taped and 14 optoelectronic cameras. The acquisition frequency was set at 150 hertz. The inter- and intra-examiner reliability of marker palpation in mm was calculated using standard deviation (SD), mean difference (MD) and standard error (SE). Amplitudes of movement according to axes defined by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) are given for the mandible and skull segments. The propagation of error on the amplitudes was calculated with the root mean square propagation error (RMSPE) in degrees. Repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman tests were used to assess the influence of the position of the head on the amplitudes of the jaw. Power analysis of the sample size was estimated with Cohen’s f3 size effect test. Steady-state plots (SSPs) and normalized motion graphs between the skull and the mandible motion were performed to study the coordination of their maximum amplitude over time. Results: The protocol demonstrated good intra-examiner reliability (1.5 < MD < 5.8; 2.6 < SD < 7.8; 2.0 < SE < 3.8), good inter-examiner reproducibility (0.2 < MD < 4.0; 3.5 < SD < 4.6; 2.0 < SE < 2.5) and small error propagation (0.0 < RMSPE intra < 2.8; 0.0 < RMSPE inter < 1.0). The amplitudes of the jaw and head found during the three types of movements correspond to the values reported in the literature. Head positions did not appear to significantly influence the amplitudes of jaw movements, which could be explained by the power estimation of our sample (Type II error β = 0.692). The participation of head movements in those of the jaw, for all motions and in all positions, was demonstrated and discussed in detail. Conclusions: The accuracy, test–retest reliability, and intra-individual variability of the TMJ kinematic analysis, including head movements, was ensured. The small sample size and the absence of standardized head positions for the subjects limit the scope of the intra- and inter-group analysis results. Given the natural biological and complex coordination of jaw–head movement, the authors consider its evaluation useful in clinical intervention and would like to further develop the present protocol. The next step should be to test the feasibility of its clinical application with a larger group of asymptomatic subjects compared to patients suffering from TMD.
Bescond et al. (Sat,) studied this question.