Bibliometric analysis reveals significant growth in post-stroke neuroplasticity research, indicating technological advancements in rehabilitation strategies.
Aims: This study aims to systematically analyze the global scientific literature on neuroplasticity in post-stroke rehabilitation to uncover major research themes, thematic evolution, and collaboration networks over the last two decades. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using data retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database, covering the period from January 2000 to December 2024. A total of 1.484 publications met the inclusion criteria. VOS viewer software was utilized to perform co-occurrence, co-authorship, co-citation, and bibliographic coupling analyses to visualize the intellectual structure and trends of the field. Results: A total of 1,484 publications were analyzed, revealing a sharp acceleration in scientific output since 2020, with a CAGR of 13.5% and a peak of 368 articles in 2023. Keyword mapping demonstrated a distinct thematic shift from foundational biological processes (2016-2018) toward advanced technological interventions like BCI, robotics, and virtual reality (2020-2022). The United States, China, and Italy emerged as the primary hubs of global productivity. Finally, co-citation and bibliographic coupling analyses delineate an integrated intellectual landscape sustained by four primary research axes: motor cortex plasticity, clinical protocols, non-invasive neuromodulation, and neuroimaging-based language recovery. Conclusion: Post-stroke neuroplasticity research has transformed into a highly dynamic and interdisciplinary field. The findings indicate a significant shift from basic biological research towards personalized and technology-assisted rehabilitation strategies. Future trends suggest an increasing integration of neuroengineering and multimodal therapies to optimize functional recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayşe Melike Gerek (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: