This research uncovers insights on creativity and learning in post-qualitative inquiry among education researchers, indicating implications for professional development.
Learning post-qualitative inquiry emerged as a new activity in education. The aim of this article is to reveal the learning peculiarities of post-qualitative inquiry among education researchers, adapting PRISMA 2020 (Page et al., 2021a, 2021b, 2021c), the main principles and thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The scientific articles were searched in EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases. A total of 854 were found: 444 in the EBSCO database, 391 in the Scopus database, and 19 in the WoS database. Catchii, the systematic literature review screener, helped to implement PRISMA 2020 stages: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion, and depict the PRISMA flow diagram. 34 articles were suitable for in-depth analysis. Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis was used to disclose learning post-qualitative inquiry among education researchers. Maxqda 24 software helped to identify themes and subthemes. The analysis showed that education researchers learn post-qualitative inquiry: a) through nomadic rethinking, b) through reading and writing, c) through empirical learning (material-based learning, etc.), and d) through art (visual art and performative art). This research shows that learning post-qualitative inquiry involves unconventional learning activities that foster divergent thinking and provide learners with greater creativity and freedom. – In addition, this study is significant for education theory and practice as it reveals the learning of post-qualitative inquiry, which is a rare and sensitive methodological approach. The learning of post-qualitative inquiry enables changes in the understanding of research methodologies, curriculum design, and the professional development of education researchers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aida Kairienė (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: