Centralized UAV logistics controllers can achieve strong navigation performance in controlled settings, but they do not capture key deployment factors in crowdsourcing-enabled emergency logistics, where heterogeneous UAV owners participate with unreliability and dropout, and incentive expenditure and fairness must be accounted for. This paper presents a decentralized crowdsourcing multi-UAV emergency logistics framework on an edge-orchestrated architecture that (i) performs urgency-aware dispatch under distance/energy/payload constraints, (ii) tracks reliability and participation dynamics under stress (unreliable agents and dropout), and (iii) quantifies incentive feasibility via total payment and payment inequality (Gini). We adopt a hybrid decision design in which PPO/DQN policies provide real-time navigation/control, while GA/ACO act as planning-level route refinement modules (not reinforcement learning) to improve global candidate quality under safety constraints. We evaluate the framework in a controlled grid-world simulator and explicitly report stress-matched re-evaluation results under matched stress settings, where applicable. In the nominal comparison, centralized DQN attains high navigation-centric success (e.g., 0.970 ± 0.095) with short reach steps, but it omits incentives by construction, whereas the proposed crowdsourcing method reports measurable payment and fairness outcomes (e.g., payment and Gini) and remains evaluable under unreliability and dropout sweeps. We further provide a utility decomposition that attributes negative-utility regimes primarily to collision-related costs and secondarily to incentive expenditure, clarifying the operational trade-off between mission value, safety risk, and incentive cost. Overall, the results indicate that navigation-only baselines can appear strong when participation economics are ignored, while a deployable crowdsourcing system must explicitly expose incentive/fairness and robustness characteristics under stress.
Han et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: