PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

A phase II randomized study of atezolizumab plus multikinase inhibitor (MKI) versus MKI alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev).

View Full Paper
WMWen Wee MaGNGarth NelsonNTNguyen H. Tran

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab combined with a multikinase inhibitor in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after progression on previous therapy.
  • Multicenter, randomized phase II trial
  • Enrolled patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
  • Patients randomized 2:1 to receive atezolizumab plus MKI (cabozantinib or lenvatinib) or MKI alone
  • Endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety
  • Median overall survival was 13.9 months for the combination therapy and 6.2 months for MKI alone
  • Median progression-free survival was 4.3 months for combination and 4.1 months for MKI alone
  • Objective response rate was 7.7% in the combination group and 0% in the MKI alone group
  • Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 46.2% of the combination group and 60.0% of the MKI alone group

Abstract

554 Background: Atezo/Bev is the 1 st -line standard for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Optimal 2 nd -line therapy post-Atezo/Bev remains undefined. This study evaluates continuation of atezolizumab with a MKI versus MKI alone in the 2 nd -line setting. Methods: This multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolled patients with unresectable aHCC who progressed on Atezo/Bev. Patients were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab plus MKI (cabozantinib or lenvatinib; Arm A) or MKI alone (Arm B). Stratification factors included MKI choice, viral etiology, and alpha-fetoprotein levels. Dual primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. With 84 death and 89 PFS events, from 122 patients, this trial had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.556 in OS and HR of 0.571 in PFS with a one-sided type I error (alpha) of 0.05 for each endpoint. Results: Twenty patients were accrued across 5 U.S. centers, between 01/2022 and 03/2025, before early closure due to slow accrual. Eighteen received treatment (Arm A: n=13; Arm B: n=5). Baseline characteristics: median age 68 yr, extrahepatic 56%, Hep B+ 0%, Hep C+ 33%, NASH 33% and CP A (5 to 6) 100%. MKIs used were cabozantinib (Arm A: 6/13; Arm B: 4/5) and lenvatinib (Arm A: 7/13; Arm B: 1/5). Median follow-up was 28.0 months (mo), with 14 deaths reported. Median (95% CI) OS were 13.9 (7.1-Not Estimable NE) and 6.2 (5.1-NE) mo (Arm A and B respectively); and that of PFS 4.3 (2.3-NE) and 4.1 (3.7-NE) mo. ORR was 7.7% (1/13) in Arm A (responder received lenvatinib) and 0% (0/5) in Arm B. Grade ≥3 adverse events (at least possibly related) occurred in 46.2% of Arm A and 60.0% of Arm B patients. G3+ events occurring in >10% of patients included hypertension, fatigue, anorexia, and ALT elevation in Arm A; and hypertension, hallucination, nausea, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, mucositis, AST increased and colitis in Arm B. Conclusions: In this limited cohort, continuation of atezolizumab with MKI showed relative activity and manageable safety in aHCC post-Atezo/Bev. The AE profile for atezo/MKI is consistent with the known profile of respective agents. These findings support further investigation of immunotherapy-based combinations in the 2nd-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT05168163 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e74713bf7a6f02c0008dhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.2_suppl.554
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper