Leadership debates often frame academic rigor and popular appeal as opposing poles, a tension largely shaped by Western, text‐centered traditions. In Indonesia and much of the Global South, this framing is poorly aligned with how leadership knowledge is actually formed and circulated. Leadership learning rarely emerges from academic journals or popular management books; instead, it is shaped through lived experience, oral traditions, cultural symbols, everyday practices, and digital platforms. This paper argues that leadership scholarship must reconsider not only what it studies but also how leadership knowledge is communicated. Drawing on case studies of two Indonesian regional leaders, Suyoto of Bojonegoro and Hasto Wardoyo of Kulon Progo, the paper shows how leadership legitimacy was built through tangible outcomes, symbolic action, and narrative presence rather than written doctrine. Their leadership lessons were transmitted through personal stories, public engagement, and online visibility, reaching nonreading publics. The paper proposes a multichannel model of leadership scholarship that preserves academic rigor while translating insights into culturally resonant, non‐textual forms that reflect where leadership learning actually takes place.
Riskawati et al. (Mon,) studied this question.