Experimental program reveals geopolymer bricks outperform fired clay in strength and eco-efficiency, indicating sustainable construction benefits.
Kiln-fired clay bricks are energy-intensive and carbon-heavy. This study develops and validates kiln-free, pressure-free, and ambient-cured geopolymer (GPM) bricks made from uncalcined clay and Class F fly ash. A two-stage experimental program screened 33 mixes (12–16 M NaOH and 396 cubes tested at 14–90 days) and then scaled six optimized mixes to 90 full-size bricks for mechanical, durability, and microstructural evaluation. Bricks with an optimal mix of 20–30% clay and 70–80% fly ash achieved a compressive strength of up to 32.5 MPa, satisfying ASTM C62 (for severe weathering) requirements. Relative to fired clay units, GPM bricks delivered +61% average compressive strength (up to +91%), +56.5% average modulus of rupture (up to +103%), 6–29% lower water absorption, and 42–84% higher UPV while their strength losses after 28-day immersion in 5% H2SO4 or 3.5% NaCl were only ~3–5%. SEM confirmed a dense N-A-S-H gel matrix with reduced porosity. Eco-efficiency analysis showed ~95% lower embodied CO2 (0.26–0.31 vs. 5.5 kg eCO2 per brick) and ~35% lower cost per MPa of strength than fired clay bricks. The findings demonstrate a practical, low-carbon brick manufactured without mechanical pressing or heat curing, delivering verified performance and durability under ambient conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: