Systematic review highlights governance issues in Jakarta's water crisis, suggesting new business models for equity.
Jakarta, one of the world’s fastest-sinking megacities, faces a multidimensional water crisis that poses an existential threat to its sustainability. This crisis stems from the historical legacy of a two-decade Public-Private Partnership (PPP) initiated in 1998, which evolved from a privatization model into a complex predicament of environmental degradation and social injustice. This study employs a systematic literature review to synthesize the academic evidence, tracing the evolution of challenges and proposed solutions over time. The synthesis reveals a cascading failure best understood through an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) lens. Initial Governance failures, rooted in flawed contractual design, metastasized into severe Environmental crises (land subsidence) and a profound Social crisis of “water equity,” disproportionately burdening the urban poor. The review concludes that Jakarta’s water crisis is fundamentally a crisis of governance, not infrastructure or affordability. Therefore, the only viable path forward is a new sustainable business model for the public utility focused on re-establishing robust governance and rebuilding public trust, which is critical for achieving water security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ade Hendraputra (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: