Evaluating inferential responsibility in LLMs via the SRTA protocol, indicating structural similarities and divergences across models.
Measuring Responsibility Invariants Across Inferential Paths in Large Language Models Overview This paper introduces SRTA (Semantic Responsibility Trace Architecture), a protocol for measuring the distribution of inferential responsibility across large language models. This work intentionally separates measurement from interpretation; no claims are made about intelligence, alignment, or correctness. Key Findings Three models (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini) were evaluated on two fundamental questions through four inferential routes: Structural convergence between Claude and ChatGPT (JSD < 0.01), with responsibility cores preserved across all routes. Structural divergence in Gemini (JSD 0.08–0.15), characterized by elevated entry-dependence and reduced core stability. Self-report validity confirmed through external grading (JSD < 0.10 for all Gemini routes). Method SRTA measures responsibility structure—the distribution of inferential weight across six fixed semantic categories: DEF: Definitional content MECH: Mechanistic explanation EPI: Empirical/experiential content COUNTER: Counterfactual reasoning META: Metaphysical grounding NORM: Normative content The protocol is model-agnostic and does not require access to internals. Metrics Core mass: Sum of the two highest-contributing categories Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD): Structural similarity between distributions Semantic proper time (τ): Estimated reasoning steps Theoretical Context This work is part of the Theological-Structural Transposition Theory (TSTT) framework. Related Works Dataset: SRTA v0.2: Cross-Model Measurement of Responsibility Invariants Time Inscription: On the Relational Nature of Time AGI Inscription: On the Structural Preconditions of AGI Citation Takagi, T. (2026). Measuring Responsibility Invariants Across Inferential Paths in Large Language Models. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18212289 Keywords SRTA, responsibility invariants, LLM evaluation, semantic measurement, cross-model comparison, Jensen-Shannon divergence, TSTT License CC-BY-4.0
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takayuki Takagi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: