Comparative study shows diagnostic accuracy of antimicrobial resistance databases for susceptibility testing in MRSA, indicating clinical implications.
Background Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been increasingly used for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance and molecular epidemiology. However, variability in AMR gene detection across databases may impact clinical interpretation. This study compared three AMR gene databases using WGS data on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and assessed their correlation with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results. Methods We analyzed WGS data from 270 MRSA bloodstream infection isolates collected through nationwide surveillance in Japan. AMR genes were identified using AMRFinderPlus, CARD, and ResFinder. AST for erythromycin, minocycline, and levofloxacin was performed by broth microdilution, applying breakpoints defined by CLSI and EUCAST guidelines. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 10. Results The numbers of AMR genes detected by AMRFinderPlus, CARD, and ResFinder were 48, 53, and 42, respectively. The average number of AMR genes detected per strain was 8.3 ± 0.2 in AMRFinderPlus, 18.6 ± 0.1 in CARD, and 7.1 ± 0.2 in ResFinder. Despite all isolates being MRSA, mecA detection rates varied among databases, with detection rates of 82.2%, 98.1%, and 100% by AMRFinderPlus, CARD, and ResFinder, respectively. Figure 1 shows the positive detection rates of AMR genes for erythromycin, minocycline, and levofloxacin at different MIC levels. The detection rates increased with higher MIC levels. The performance of WGS-based AMR gene detection in predicting AST results is summarized in Table 1. Sensitivity varied across antimicrobial classes and databases, with CARD demonstrating the highest sensitivity overall. LR⁺ values indicated that CARD had the strongest diagnostic accuracy for predicting AST-confirmed resistance. Sensitivity increased when considering resistance gene detection in at least one of the three databases, but this was accompanied by a decrease in the positive likelihood ratio (LR⁺). Conclusion CARD demonstrated high sensitivity for erythromycin, minocycline, and levofloxacin. However, it did not detect mecA in a few isolates, raising concerns about MRSA identification. Integrating WGS-based AMR gene detection into clinical practice will require ongoing validation to ensure accuracy and reliability. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaku et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: