Research identifies the role of smoothing in improving data quality control for hydrological modeling workflows.
The performance of deep learning-based hydrological forecasting is highly sensitive to input quality, yet existing studies lack a systematic framework to evaluate the impact of high-frequency noise based on hydrological characteristics. To address this, we propose a frequency-based framework to assess the robustness of LSTM runoff prediction models. We define three hydrologically meaningful noise types—long-term trend, short-term event, and transient interference—and employ a synthetic noise injection strategy on the CAMELS dataset. Furthermore, we introduce an adaptive exponentially weighted moving average (AEWMA) algorithm that dynamically adjusts smoothing based on local signal variability. Results from dual-domain evaluation (time and frequency) indicate that model accuracy deteriorates significantly when high-frequency noise exceeds 30% of the total signal energy. Moderate adaptive smoothing (e.g., α=0.9&0.6) effectively preserves hydrological signals while mitigating performance loss, whereas aggressive smoothing suppresses meaningful variations. This study underscores the necessity of noise-type-specific preprocessing and suggests spectral energy ratios as quantitative thresholds for adaptive data quality control in hydrological modeling workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: