Pilot analysis demonstrates radiomics identifies phenotypes in gastroesophageal cancer, suggesting prognostic associations with CT imaging.
438 Background: Radiomics has emerged as a promising approach for non-invasive biomarker discovery in oncology. However, its application in gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) remains underexplored. Leveraging the Cancer Moonshot Biobank Imaging Cohort (CMB-GEC), we evaluated whether longitudinal CT imaging could yield reproducible radiomic biomarkers with potential prognostic relevance. Methods: We analyzed CT series from 6 patients with GEC (CMB-GEC). DICOM studies were converted to isotropic 1-mm NIfTI volumes using SimpleITK, followed by semi-automated tumor segmentation. Quantitative radiomic features (~1,500 per case; intensity, texture, and shape) were extracted using PyRadiomics. Features were cleaned by excluding diagnostic metadata, constant values, and all-NaN columns, yielding a stable feature set. Heatmaps and correlation analyses were performed to identify feature redundancy and patient clustering. Results: Initial extraction: ~1,500 features per patient. Stable features retained after cleaning: 6 shape/size descriptors (e.g., VoxelVolume, Major/Minor axis lengths, Elongation, Flatness). Strong correlations were observed among volume and axis features (ρ > 0.9). Elongation and Flatness were moderately correlated (ρ ≈ 0.69). Patient clustering revealed two dominant phenotypes: Size-driven tumors (MSB-04437, MSB-01493); shape-driven, elongated tumors (MSB-06857, MSB-09348); two patients showed intermediate profiles. Conclusions: This pilot radiomics analysis demonstrates that size and shape-related biomarkers can be stably extracted from CT imaging in GEC, even in a small cohort. While most advanced texture features collapsed due to limited sample size, clustering revealed biologically plausible subgroups. Expansion to the full CMB-GEC cohort will enable validation and exploration of prognostic associations with treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moustafa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: