PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

A Phase 3, Randomized, Modified Double-blind Study Demonstrates Immunological Superiority of High-Dose (HD) Over Standard-Dose (SD) Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV) in Adults 50 Through 64 Years of Age

View Full Paper
RGRachna GuptaMorristown Medical CenterAHAshley HuangMorristown Medical CenterMDMaya DunstanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute

Key Points

  • To evaluate the immune response and safety of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines in adults aged 50-64.
  • Phase 3, randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled multicenter study
  • Participants aged 50-64 randomized to receive either high-dose or standard-dose influenza vaccine
  • Immunogenicity assessed at Day 29 using hemagglutination inhibition assay
  • IIV-HD induced higher immune response than IIV-SD for all three influenza strains
  • Noninferiority achieved for both geometric mean titer and seroconversion rate across strains
  • Superiority confirmed for H3N2 with GMT ratio exceeding stringent thresholds

Abstract

Abstract Background Adults 50-64 years have reduced immune response to SD influenza vaccines and higher morbidity associated with severe influenza than younger adults. IIV-HD (Fluzone® HD) contains 4 times the antigen as IIV-SD, is preferentially recommended in the US for persons ≥65 years, and has a well-established safety profile. This study aimed to establish noninferiority (NI) and superiority of IIV- HD immune response compared to IIV-SD and assess safety in adults 50-64 years of age.Figure 1.Forest plot - Post-vaccination GMT ratio and 95% CI of IIV-HD compared to IIV-SD at D29Table 1:Disposition by randomized group Methods A Phase 3, randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled multicenter study (NCT06641180) was conducted in the US (Nov 2024 -Jun 2025). Participants 50-64 years old were randomized 1:1 to either IIV-HD or IIV-SD (Fluarix®, GSK) on Day (D) 01, followed for immunogenicity up to D29 and safety through 6 months. Primary objective was to evaluate NI of IIV-HD by ratio of geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroconversion rate (SCR), measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI), 28 days postvaccination. If NI was achieved for all 3 strains, IIV-HD superiority was assessed based on GMTs. If achieved, then superiority to a stringent threshold for at least one strain was tested. Results 1171 participants were vaccinated; 1137 (96.4%) provided a blood sample at D01 and D29 (Table 1). Median age was 57 years; majority were female 54.9% and of white race 61.4%. Previous season influenza vaccination in 31.9% (IIV-HD) vs 33.4% (IIV-SD). IIV-HD induced higher HAI GMTs and SCR than IIV-SD (Fig 1, Table 2). Coprimary immunogenicity endpoints of NI for HAI GMTs and SCR were achieved for all 3 vaccine matched strains. IIV-HD also demonstrated a superior immune response vs IIV-SD by D29 GMT ratio (95% confidence interval CI lower limit 1) for all 3 strains. In addition, stringent threshold superiority was achieved for H3N2 for GMT ratio (98.3% CI lower limit 1.5). The expected safety profile was confirmed in this age group through D29. Conclusion In adults 50–64-years of age, IIV-HD demonstrated robust and superior immune responses to IIV-SD for all 3 influenza strains. IIV-HD met stringent superiority criteria for the H3N2 strain indicating HD H3N2 antibody levels are at least 50% higher than SD. These results support the safe and potential use of IIV-HD in this age group. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31d13bf7a6f02c00cbahttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper