Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiment shows neural representations of choice and reward in mice, indicating integration is task-dependent and sensitive to contingencies.
In reward foraging tasks, prefrontal neurons track reward history, yet animals also show persistent choice-history biases. How these histories are represented in prefrontal circuits and guide animals’ decisions remains unknown. We asked whether past rewards and choices are incorporated by leaky integration or carried as discrete, history-specific codes, and how these codes are recruited under different task demands. We recorded medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) activity while mice performed probabilistic reward foraging task and fit a reinforcement-learning model whose decision variable, combining reward and choice histories, captured behavior. Neurons represented history-specific rewards and choices while integrating them consistent with their behavioral impact. We then altered reward contingencies and inter-choice intervals and transiently inactivated mPFC. Neural representations adapted to changing task demands, yet the behavioral impact of inactivation was sensitive to inter-choice interval and reward contingencies. We conclude that mPFC hosts redundant computations whose influence is gated by timing and task structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López-Yépez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: