Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study shows 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT effectively stages liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases, suggesting improved diagnostic performance.
To explore the potential value of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in staging liver fibrosis of patients with chronic liver diseases, and to preliminarily compare its diagnostic performance with Fibroscan and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. The single-center prospective study enrolled participants with chronic liver diseases who had undergone liver biopsy. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT grading is conducted through a scoring system: TBRliver−to−blood greater than 2 as F4, TBRliver−to−blood between 1 and 2 as F2/3, and TBRliver−to−blood less than 1 as F0/1. The diagnostic performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was preliminarily compared with Fibroscan and FIB-4 using accuracy and weighted Kappa values. A total of 14 participants (8 men, 6 women) were enrolled. According to the METAVIR scoring system, 6 participants (43%) had F0/1 fibrosis, 4 (28%) had F2, and 4 (28%) had F4. The TBRliver−to−blood in the F0/1 group (0.83 ± 0.07) was significantly lower than that in the F4 group (2.12 ± 0.78) (P = 0.010). Using a TBRliver−to−blood > 1 for 68Ga-FAPI-04 to diagnose F ≥ 2 fibrosis yielded a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 83.3%, and PPV of 87.5%. Both FIB-4 and Fibroscan correctly classified 10/14 (71.4%) participants (weighted Kappa values: 0.696 and 0.598, respectively). 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT successfully differentiated 12/14 (85.7%) participants (weighted Kappa = 0.841). The results of this preliminary study suggest that 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may be an effective non-invasive method for assessing liver fibrosis and could potentially outperform FIB-4 and Fibroscan. Further clinical trials are warranted for validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: