PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Electronic Markets4 citationsOpen Access

AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities

View Full Paper
GPGleb PapyshevKCKeith Jin Deng Chan

Key Points

  • This article explores how the EU can assert its digital sovereignty through AI regulation amid global tech disparities.
  • Developed a game-theoretic model to analyze the EU's regulatory strategy.
  • Examined the trade-offs between protecting local firms and accessing AI technologies.
  • Applied the model to the provisions of the EU AI Act.
  • Stringent regulation is a rational choice if it mainly constrains foreign firms.
  • EU's effectiveness depends on redistributive impacts on market power.
  • The level of US technological competitiveness influences the strategy.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the European Union’s (EU) strategy to assert digital sovereignty through stringent artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, situated within evolving geopolitical dynamics and widening technological disparities with the United States (US). A game-theoretic model is developed to analyze the strategic dilemma confronting EU regulators, who must balance the protection of domestic market share for local firms against maintaining access to leading AI technologies. The analysis shows that stringent regulation constitutes a rational strategy only when it disproportionately constrains foreign firms and when foreign technological advantages in the domestic market are significant but not overwhelming. Applying this framework to the EU AI Act’s provisions on general-purpose AI, the study illustrates that the effectiveness of the EU’s approach is contingent on its redistributive effect on domestic market power, the level of US technological competitiveness, and the state of transatlantic cooperation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Papyshev et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6967196bc0d1e3cfbfce8c7ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00870-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper