The CoDE-HF algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.839 and a NPV of 98.6% for diagnosing acute heart failure in patients without prior heart failure.
Does the CoDE-HF machine learning algorithm improve diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure compared to standard NT-proBNP thresholds in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with acute breathlessness?
The CoDE-HF machine learning algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of acute heart failure in the emergency department compared to standard NT-proBNP thresholds, particularly by enhancing rule-in specificity and positive predictive value.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Background Diagnosing acute heart failure in the Emergency Department remains challenging. CoDE-HF (Collaboration for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Heart Failure) is a previously developed machine learning algorithm that predicts an individualised probability of acute heart failure using NT-proBNP as a continuous variable in combination with routinely available clinical variables.(1) Purpose To externally validate the CoDE-HF algorithm in a prospective cohort of patients presenting with acute breathlessness. Methods Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with acute breathlessness in whom acute heart failure was suspected were enrolled in this study. CoDE-HF integrates NT-proBNP with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin, body mass index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, peripheral oedema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ischaemic heart disease. Diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists, with disagreements resolved by a third. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, and diagnostic accuracy at pre-specified thresholds. Results Overall, 1,030 patients (mean age 73±14, 49% female) were included in this study, of whom, 29% (294/1,030) had a prior diagnosis of heart failure. Acute heart failure was adjudicated in 374 of 1,030 patients (36%). In patients without prior heart failure, the NT-proBNP rule-out threshold of 300 pg/mL identified 32% as low probability, with sensitivity 95.9% (91.9–97.9) and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.6% (93.3–98.3). The age-specific rule-in thresholds identified 47% as high probability, with specificity 65.4% (61.3–69.3) and positive predictive value (PPV) 45.8% (40.6–51.1). In the same group, CoDE-HF had an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI 0.809–0.869) and Brier score of 0.152. A rule-out threshold of 5.7 identified 30% as low probability, with sensitivity 98.4% (95.3–99.5) and NPV 98.6% (95.7–99.5). A rule-in threshold of 69.2 identified 19% as high probability, with specificity 90.1% (87.2–92.3) and PPV 61.7% (53.4–69.3). In patients with prior heart failure, the NT-proBNP age-specific rule-in thresholds identified 75% as high probability, with specificity 33.6% (25.5–42.8) and PPV 65.9% (59.4–71.9). The CoDE-HF rule-in threshold of 85.0 identified 36% as high probability, with specificity 80.5% (72.2–86.8) and PPV 80.2% (71.7–86.6). Conclusions In this prospective cohort, CoDE-HF provided improved, individualised diagnostic accuracy, especially in patients without prior heart failure. It offers a consistent, data-driven tool to support clinical decision-making.
Doudesis et al. (Thu,) reported a other. The CoDE-HF algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.839 and a NPV of 98.6% for diagnosing acute heart failure in patients without prior heart failure.