PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Calibrated Transformer Fusion for Dual-View Low-Energy CESM Classification

View Full Paper
AAAhmed AlkurdiZTZahraa Taha

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a dual-view classification framework for low-energy CESM images, differentiating between normal and tumorous breast tissue.
  • Utilized dual-view images from CESM for classification.
  • Incorporated CNN feature extraction and transformer-based fusion methods.
  • Applied 5-fold stratified group cross-validation with patient-level grouping.
  • Employed MC-dropout for uncertainty estimation and logistic calibration.
  • Model E achieved a mean accuracy of 96.88% ± 2.39%.
  • Mean F1-score was 97.68% ± 1.66%.
  • Mean ROC-AUC and PR-AUC were 0.9915 ± 0.0098 and 0.9968 ± 0.0029, respectively.
  • The model produced a low mean Brier score of 0.0236 ± 0.0145 and a low mean ECE of 0.0334 ± 0.0171.

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) provides low-energy images acquired in standard craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, and clinical interpretation relies on integrating both views. This study proposes a dual-view classification framework that combines deep CNN feature extraction with transformer-based fusion for breast-side classification using low-energy (DM) images from CESM acquisitions (Normal vs. Tumorous; benign and malignant merged). The evaluation was conducted using 5-fold stratified group cross-validation with patient-level grouping to prevent leakage across folds. The final configuration (Model E) integrates dual-backbone feature extraction, transformer fusion, MC-dropout inference for uncertainty estimation, and post hoc logistic calibration. Across the five held-out test folds, Model E achieved a mean accuracy of 96.88% ± 2.39% and a mean F1-score of 97.68% ± 1.66%. The mean ROC-AUC and PR-AUC were 0.9915 ± 0.0098 and 0.9968 ± 0.0029, respectively. Probability quality was supported by a mean Brier score of 0.0236 ± 0.0145 and a mean expected calibration error (ECE) of 0.0334 ± 0.0171. An ablation study (Models A–E) was also reported to quantify the incremental contribution of dual-view input, transformer fusion, and uncertainty calibration. Within the limits of this retrospective single-center setting, these results suggest that dual-view transformer fusion can provide strong discrimination while also producing calibrated probabilities and uncertainty outputs that are relevant for decision support.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alkurdi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696719a7c0d1e3cfbfce8f14https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12010041
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper