Meta-analysis assesses cover crops' effects on soil carbon, crop yield, and weed suppression, indicating potential benefits.
Cover crops (CCs) are widely promoted for their multifunctional roles in sustainable agriculture, including improving soil health, enhancing crop productivity, and suppressing weeds. This meta-analysis quantitatively assessed the effects of CCs on three key outcomes: soil organic carbon (SOC), successor crop yield, and weed biomass, based on data from multiple independent studies. Weighted random-effects models and log response ratios (lnRR) were used to synthesize results. CCs significantly increased SOC (mean lnRR = 0.390), corresponding to an estimated 47.7% gain compared to controls, although substantial heterogeneity was observed (I 2 = 97%), indicating context-dependent responses across systems. Successor crop yields showed an overall neutral response (mean lnRR = 0.052), with high between-study variability (I² = 90.5%), suggesting that positive or negative outcomes depend on site-specific factors. Weed biomass was consistently reduced across all studies (mean lnRR = –1.759), corresponding to an average 82.8% suppression, although variability remained high (I² = 99.2%). Complementary economic analysis indicated that while CCs involve initial establishment costs (∼USD 150/ha), these are often offset by savings in agrochemical use, improved weed and fertility management, and long-term gains in land value. Altogether, the results highlight the potential of CCs as a sustainable agronomic practice, offering multiple ecosystem services and economic co-benefits. Optimizing species selection, management timing, and system integration will be key to maximizing outcomes under diverse agronomic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cristian Malavert (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: