This article reveals how anaphora shapes poetic experience by creating a habit-forming structure in poetry, suggesting broader implications for understanding the art form.
This article proposes a theory of poetic practice grounded in the concept of anaphora. While literary theorists like Ribeiro and Culler have emphasized repetition as a defining feature of poetry - either through intentional reference to tradition or through rhetorical activation - I argue that anaphora reveals a more complex temporal and pragmatic structure at the heart of poetic experience. Drawing on examples from both the poetic tradition and contemporary experimental poetry, I show that anaphora in poetry functions not only as linguistic repetition but as a habit based and habit forming dispositional structure that operates across textual, ritual, and agential domains. This anticipatory and reflexive mode of iteration, which I call “habit zero,” displaces intentionalist models of repetition and reframes poetry as a socially embedded practice of suspended and reconfigured habitual life-forms. Accordingly, poetry is best understood not as a genre or institution, but as a critical practice of deferred antecedence: a temporally bifocal structure of iteration that calls into being its own antecedents through formal repetition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Italo Testa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: