A universal approach to managing a person’s digital identity may be the single most important advancement to the Internet since its inception, promising the seamless flow of information, averting cybercrime, eliminating login credentials, and restoring privacy and trust through greater control of one’s identity online. However, this advancement brings significant risks, especially regarding personal privacy. It demands the meticulous development of digital identity infrastructure that balances robust data security measures with ethical handling of sensitive information, thereby safeguarding against misuse and unauthorised access. Currently, a consolidated vision for digital identity implementation remains unresolved, and aligning the different stakeholders’ motives and expectations is a challenging task. This article reviews and analyses the perspectives and expectations of four key stakeholder groups—government, business, academia, and consumers—regarding a digital identity ecosystem, aiming to increase trust in an eventual design framework. Using an online survey stratified across government, business, academia, and consumers, we identify areas of alignment and divergence regarding privacy, trust, usability, and governance expectations. We then encode these stakeholder expectations into a layered conceptual structure and illustrate its use as metadata for context-layered retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in digital identity scenarios.
Comb et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: