Explores how pareidolia relates to human perception, suggesting it arises naturally rather than from errors.
This paper proposes a non-reductive structural alignment between pareidolic experience and contemporary models of human perception, particularly within predictive processing frameworks. Rather than treating pareidolia as a perceptual error or cognitive malfunction, the paper argues that pareidolic phenomena emerge naturally from high-sensitivity perceptual systems operating under uncertainty. By outlining a sequence of experiential states and mapping them onto established neuroscientific mechanisms, the paper demonstrates that pareidolia can be understood as a lawful outcome of perceptual prediction and attribution, without reducing lived experience to neural causation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darius Hellabad (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: