Investigates piezoelectric energy harvesters' performance in bistable versus quad-stable setups, indicating optimal design principles for energy harvesting.
This study investigates a piezoelectric energy harvester with three hinged springs, in which bistable or quad-stable potential wells are configured by adjusting spring assembly distances under equivalent potential barrier constraints. Static bifurcation analysis reveals the formation mechanisms of multistable topologies, while dynamic analysis characterizes intra-well and inter-well resonant responses. A multiobjective framework integrating Root Mean Square (RMS) voltage, effective bandwidth, and Basin of Attraction (BA) area is established to quantify the performance of the bistable and quad-stable energy harvesting systems. Numerical simulations using the cell-mapping approach with fourth-order Runge–Kutta integration demonstrate the superior practical performance of the bistable configuration under low-to-moderate base vibration amplitudes, resulting from its significantly larger BAs that ensure reliable high-energy responses. Conversely, a reversal in performance dominance occurs at higher amplitudes, where the quad-stable system prevails due to its broader BAs that enable robust inter-well oscillations. The core innovation of this work lies in establishing a direct link between the geometrically parameterized potential wells of the system and the resulting amplitude-dependent basin stability, offering a deterministic design principle for selecting and optimizing nonlinear energy harvesters according to anticipated environmental vibrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: