This approach combines gravity-compensated control with whole-body optimization to enhance locomotion stability in humanoid robots, suggesting improved performance.
Achieving stable and coordinated locomotion in high-dimensional humanoid robots remains challenging, particularly considering variations in support phases, model uncertainties, and redundancy arising from multi-degree-of-freedom (DOF) joints. To address these issues, a predictive control framework that integrates gravity-compensated model-predictive control (GC-MPC) with hierarchical Whole-Body Control (WBC) was proposed, targeting force prediction issues under varying contact conditions. The introduction of distributed reference plantar forces derived from rigid-body dynamics into the MPC formulation enabled more stable and physically consistent force tracking across support transitions. The developed hierarchical WBC was efficiently integrated with GC-MPC, featuring flat-foot constraints for enhanced contact stability and task allocation to resolve kinematic redundancy. This enables a real-time joint-level control under physical and task constraints, effectively mitigating the gap between the predicted and the actual system behavior, improving robustness in high-dimensional humanoid systems. The proposed approach was validated on AzureLoong, a full-size humanoid robot (1.85 m, 75.5 kg) via simulation and physical experiments. The obtained results demonstrated a stable walking performance, balance control, accurate torso tracking, and smooth transitions under diverse motion commands, achieving a 25.57% reduction in the average decay rate of the plantar force prediction. This work reliably deploys predictive control on large-scale humanoid systems and establishes a solid foundation for subsequent integration with navigation, manipulation, reinforcement learning (RL)-based whole-body or predictive control, particularly for the responsive locomotion control under diverse and concurrent task commands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: