Editors present an innovative format of essayistic works in humanities to explore character and fate.
As editors, we decided to not fight the obscurity of "Fate and Character" but work with it, in its spirit. Thus, rather than solicit standard research essays, we invited a wide range of scholars from across the humanities to write short, essayistic pieces. The goal was to produce theory in a different register—free-wheeling, consciously essayistic, eagerly associative, and, yes, "digressive"—in which a cast of concepts and characters serves to guide the issue's organization, in the hope to deliver a set of readings that are at once legible, digestible, and surprising in their different styles and approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aumiller et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: