Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nanoparticle system effectively reduces tuberculosis burden in mice, suggesting new treatment options.
To address limitations in tuberculosis (TB) therapy, we developed an inhalable, immunomodulating, biocompatible nanoparticle system (β-C-P) encapsulating rifampin that targets alveolar macrophage. The nanoparticle consists of a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) core, a chitosan coating, and a surface functionalized with 1,3-β-glucan for enhanced macrophage uptake and immunomodulation. We evaluated the safety, immunological effects, and efficacy of rifampin-loaded β-C-P nanoparticles delivered via oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) in healthy mice and in a low-dose Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb ) BALB/c model treated weekly for 4 weeks, as well as in a low-dose Mtb C3HeB/FeJ model treated weekly for 8 weeks. In healthy mice, cell pellets isolated by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) showed higher pulmonary exposure (AUC) of rifampin with 20% β-C-P nanoparticles versus 5% β-C-P nanoparticles, while no rifampin was detected in the oral rifampin group. Flow cytometry revealed no significant changes in lung immune cell populations except for a transient neutrophil increase at day 21 in the 5% β-C-P group. In the Mtb BALB/c mouse model, weekly OPA administration of 5%, 10%, and 20% β-C-P nanoparticles significantly reduced lung CFU by 0.5–1.11 log 10 , comparable to daily oral rifampin. In the Mtb C3HeB/FeJ (Kramnik) mouse model, weekly OPA administration of 10% and 20% β-C-P nanoparticles significantly reduced lung CFU, comparable to daily oral rifampin. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that weekly pulmonary nanoparticle delivery of rifampin-loaded β-C-P nanoparticles achieves sustained rifampin exposure and therapeutic efficacy comparable to daily dosing, without pulmonary toxicity or systemic immune activation. This supports the potential of long-acting inhalable formulations for simplified TB therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutscher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: