Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
First-principles calculations reveal diffusion energy barriers for boron and carbon in iron, indicating migration preferences.
The occupation and migration of boron (B) and carbon (C) in both body-centered cubic (BCC) iron and face-centered cubic (FCC) iron have been investigated using first-principles calculations. We examined the solution energies of all potential sites, including substitution sites (SS), octahedral sites (OIS) and tetrahedral sites (TIS) for B and C in BCC and FCC Fe. The site’s preference of an individual B/C atom in iron forms the following sequence: SS[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]TIS[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]OIS, for a B atom in BCC Fe; SS[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]OIS[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]TIS, for a B atom in FCC Fe; OIS[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]TIS[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]SS, for a C atom in BCC and FCC Fe. The optimal migration paths and the minimum diffusion energy barrier of B and C in both BCC and FCC iron have also been investigated. The migration path sequences are as follows: Tet 1 –Tet 2 and Oct 1 –Oct 2 for boron in BCC and FCC iron; Oct 1 –Tet–Oct 2 and Oct 1 –Oct 2 for carbon in BCC and FCC iron. The diffusion energy barriers are 0.87[Formula: see text]eV and 0.98[Formula: see text]eV for carbon and 0.89[Formula: see text]eV and 1.02[Formula: see text]eV for boron in BCC and FCC Fe. We found that much more energy is needed for B and C migrating in FCC Fe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: