Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase II trial shows improved overall survival for advanced ovarian cancer with high clonal mutation burden.
PURPOSE Frontline ovarian cancer treatment protocols involving bevacizumab, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have failed to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with homologous recombination–proficient (HRP) tumors. To determine mechanistic mutation signatures associated with OS advantage, we constructed a whole-exome sequencing bioinformatic pipeline assay to analyze all 91 patients enrolled in the double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase II VITAL trial. METHODS We hypothesized that patients with stage IIIb-IV ovarian cancer who have HRP profile and high clonal tumor mutation burden (cTMB-H) will achieve greater response when undergoing maintenance therapy with gemogenovatucel-T. Our primary objective was assessment of OS using the Kaplan-Meier method among randomly assigned patients receiving either gemogenovatucel-T or placebo. RESULTS The median OS in cTMB-H/HRP patients treated with gemogenovatucel-T was 68 months versus 19 months in those treated with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.83; 1-sided P = .008). The cTMB-H patients in the non-HRP group did not demonstrate OS advantage (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.39 to 2.47; 1-sided P = .488). No grade 3 treatment-related toxicity was observed in the gemogenovatucel-T group with a follow-up of 8.4 years. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate OS advantage for maintenance treatment of adult females with newly diagnosed, advanced stage IIIb-IV ovarian cancer with HRP status and cTMB-H profile who are in complete response after debulking surgery and frontline platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coleman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: