Key result
Fsr-deficient Enterococcus faecalis strains are linked to prolonged bacteremia in infective endocarditis.
Experimental models demonstrate that loss of Fsr quorum sensing increases biofilm formation in enterococcal infective endocarditis, indicating its role in disease severity.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe heart infection caused predominantly by Gram-positive bacteria forming biofilm on heart valves. While biofilm formation is central to disease progression, the underlying bacterial mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we identify the Fsr quorum sensing (QS) system of Enterococcus faecalis as an unexpected negative regulator of biofilm and pathogenesis in IE. Using microfluidic and in vivo models, we show that blood flow prevents Fsr activation in early IE, with Fsr induction occurring only later, once bacteria form biofilm microcolonies and become shielded from flow. Deletion of Fsr promotes robust biofilm growth, driven partly through the downregulation of GelE and SprE proteases, reprograms metabolism by upregulating lrgAB to enhance pyruvate utilization, and increases gentamicin tolerance in vivo. Furthermore, we show that GelE cleaves the human pro-IL-1β into an active form, suggesting a species-specific mechanism for inflammation modulation by QS. In support of these findings, analysis of IE patient cohorts shows that naturally occurring Fsr-deficient E. faecalis strains are associated with prolonged bacteremia. Overall, our findings provide insights into how host blood flow impacts QS activation, which, in turn, regulates pathogenesis in IE, and highlight the Fsr QS as a potential determinant of clinical disease course.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antypas et al. (2026) studied Infective endocarditis. Fsr-deficient E. faecalis strains was evaluated on Prolonged bacteremia. Naturally occurring Fsr-deficient Enterococcus faecalis strains are associated with prolonged bacteremia in patients with infective endocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: