Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated evaluation approach shows strong correlation with manual scoring in rice resistance assessment, suggesting efficiency in breeding programs.
Accurate assessment of rice resistance to Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) is essential for breeding insect-resistant cultivars. Traditional assessment methods rely on manual scoring of damage severity, which is subjective and inefficient. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes an automated resistance evaluation approach based on multi-view 3D reconstruction and deep learning–based point cloud segmentation. Multi-view videos of rice materials with different resistance levels were collected over time and processed using Structure from Motion (SfM) and Multi-View Stereo (MVS) to reconstruct high-quality 3D point clouds. A well-annotated “3D Rice WBPH Damage” dataset comprising 174 samples (15 rice materials, three replicates each, 45 pots) was established, where each sample corresponds to a reconstructed 3D point cloud from a video sequence. A comparative study of various point cloud semantic segmentation models, including PointNet, PointNet++, ShellNet, and PointCNN, revealed that the PointNet++ (MSG) model, which employs a Multi-Scale Grouping strategy, demonstrated the best performance in segmenting complex damage symptoms. To further accurately quantify the severity of damage, an adaptive point cloud dimensionality reduction method was proposed, which effectively mitigates the interference of leaf shrinkage on damage assessment. Experimental results demonstrated a strong correlation (R2 = 0.95) between automated and manual evaluations, achieving accuracies of 86.67% and 93.33% at the sample and material levels, respectively. This work provides an objective, efficient, and scalable solution for evaluating rice resistance to S. furcifera, offering promising applications in crop resistance breeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: