PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of Dominant and Non-Dominant Muscle Function Recovery and Limb Symmetry After Achilles Tendon Repair: A Retrospective Study

View Full Paper
XXXiangzi XiaoYKY. C. KimJLJiyoung Lee

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the recovery patterns of dominant and non-dominant limb injuries post Achilles tendon repair.
  • Retrospective analysis of 34 active male recreational participants
  • Standard rehabilitation program over 12 months
  • Regular check-ups every three months
  • Measured outcomes included range of motion, strength, and balance tests
  • Both limb groups showed continuous improvement in range of motion and strength over time
  • Dominant limb strength was greater at 6 and 9 months, equalized by 12 months
  • Dynamic balance was significantly better in the dominant limb group at 12 months
  • Both groups exceeded 90% limb symmetry for most measures, except dynamic balance for the non-dominant group

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Achilles tendon is the largest tendon in the human body; it is frequently ruptured during sports and other dynamic physical activities. The purpose of this study was to compare recovery patterns over time between injuries to the dominant (DMT) and non-dominant (NDMT) limbs, and to examine differences in the limb symmetry index (LSI) for the uninjured side. Methods: This study includes a retrospective analysis of individuals who completed a standard rehabilitation program for 12 months and had regular checkups every three months. The study sample comprised 17 patients with DMT injuries and 17 patients with NDMT injuries, all active male recreational participants who underwent surgical repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Outcome measures included dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), calf circumference, plantarflexion strength, hop test performance, and the Y-Balance Test (YBT). Results: Both groups demonstrated continuous, progressive improvement in ROM, plantarflexion strength, hop test distance, and YBT scores, showing a significant main effect of time (p 0.05). In all three YBT directions, the DMT group achieved greater reach distances than the NDMT group at 12 months (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, both groups exceeded 90% LSI in ROM, calf circumference, plantarflexion strength, and hop performance (p < 0.05). However, in the YBT, only the DMT group surpassed 90% LSI, whereas the NDMT group showed poorer recovery. Conclusions: ROM, calf circumference, and muscle strength ultimately showed no significant differences between groups, but dynamic balance recovery was superior in the DMT group. These findings suggest that clinicians and rehabilitation specialists should consider leg dominance when designing rehabilitation programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b25a9d2a12237a9348f85https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper