Longitudinal analysis reveals oral frailty worsens cognitive function and mental well-being in older adults, suggesting intervention opportunities.
Background Oral frailty may be associated with adverse health outcomes; however, its long-term impact on psychological well-being and cognitive function remains unclear. We aimed to examine the longitudinal association between oral frailty and trajectories of subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults. Methods We conducted a 12-year prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years in Kashiwa, Japan. Oral frailty was assessed using items corresponding to Oral Frailty 5-item checklist (OF-5). Outcomes included the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index, Geriatric Depression Scale-5, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), operationally defined as a screening-based outcome using an MMSE cut-off ≤27. All OF-5 components and outcomes were measured across seven waves (2012–2024). Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to examine longitudinal associations. Results A total of 1,679 participants (mean age 72.7 ± 5.5 years, 49.5% female) were included. Baseline oral frailty was associated with lower subjective well-being (adjusted β = −0.47; 95% CI: −0.77 to − 0.17) and higher depressive symptoms (adjusted β = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.19), while time-varying oral frailty showed consistent concurrent associations with both outcomes. Only baseline oral frailty was associated with an increased risk of MCI (adjusted risk ratio, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.38). Conclusions Oral frailty has sustained adverse effects on mental well-being and is associated with an elevated risk of cognitive decline. Oral frailty may represent a potential target for interventions aimed at supporting mental and cognitive health in aging populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: