Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimization improves sonic boom management and aerodynamic performance in supersonic civil aircraft, suggesting effective design methods.
Reducing the sonic boom intensity and increasing the cruise lift-to-drag ratio are pivotal technologies for the successful development of supersonic civil aircraft. To address the limitation that sonic boom research primarily focuses on characteristics directly beneath the flight track, a full-carpet sonic boom and aerodynamic characteristics prediction software (AERO-BOOM) was independently developed. This software is based on the Panel Method, Modified Linearized Theory, the Waveform Parameter Method, and the Stevens Perceived Noise Evaluation Method. AERO-BOOM can efficiently assess the lift-to-drag ratio and the full-carpet sonic boom characteristics of supersonic civil aircraft. Building upon this software, a Multidisciplinary Optimization design platform for full-carpet sonic boom and aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic civil aircraft was established, utilizing an in-house hybrid surrogate-aided differential evolution optimization algorithm. For a supersonic civil aircraft, both fuselage optimization and overall aircraft optimization were conducted. The optimization objectives were the lift-to-drag ratio and the full-carpet sonic boom loudness (FBL). The optimization results demonstrate that fuselage optimization (e.g., employing a downward-cambered nose) increased the lift-to-drag ratio by 0.26 and reduced the FBL by 0.62 PLdB. Furthermore, the overall aircraft optimization (involving modifications to the wing planform and increasing the tail sweep angle) yielded a 1.51 increase in the lift-to-drag ratio and a 1.09 PLdB reduction in the FBL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: