PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology0 citationsOpen Access

Characterizing Barriers to Engaging in Digestive Healthcare for Sexual and Gender Minority People in the United States

View Full Paper
JCJenna ClukeyAGAlexander GoldowskyAGAlexandra Goad

Key Points

  • This research aims to describe barriers to engaging in digestive healthcare experienced by sexual and gender minority individuals and primary care providers.
  • Conducted qualitative interviews with 40 sexual and gender minority patients and 24 primary care providers across 18 U.S. states.
  • Utilized virtual semi-structured interviews to gather data on experiences and perceptions regarding digestive healthcare.
  • Implemented thematic analysis to identify common barriers and challenges faced by SGM individuals in accessing healthcare.
  • Identified key barriers including discrimination, lack of understanding of SGM needs, and psychological distress linked to GI symptoms.
  • Recommended actionable strategies to enhance SGM-affirming practices in digestive healthcare settings.
  • Achieved thematic saturation with significant insights from both patients and primary care providers.

Abstract

Introduction: In a national United States (US)-based group, we sought to describe barriers identified by sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients and primary care providers (PCPs) that challenge the provision of SGM-affirming digestive healthcare via qualitative methodology. Methods: Forty patient participants and 24 PCPs were recruited from a random sample of 18 states within the 9 principal US Census Divisions and 2 states near the home institution. Patient participants selected completed a virtual semi-structured qualitative interview regarding their experiences with digestive healthcare and their views on barriers to engaging in digestive health care. PCPs were interviewed on treating SGM patients with GI disorders and interactions with GI consultants. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. The study was conducted from November 2023 to August 2024. Results: Thematic saturation was achieved at 36 patient participants and 21 PCPs. Major themes included SGM discrimination in digestive healthcare, SGM issues in engaging in digestive healthcare, GI symptoms and other aspects of health-specific conditions, and ways to improve digestive healthcare for the SGM community. Participants noted a link between psychological distress in the SGM population and GI symptoms and offered actionable suggestions to improve SGM-focused digestive healthcare. Conclusion: Systematic deficiencies were identified in the provision of SGM-affirming digestive care, related to bias within healthcare systems and a lack of understanding of unique SGM-related needs throughout the US. Further research studying improved shared clinician and SGM GI patient engagement is needed to address these sources of health inequity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clukey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2631d2a12237a9349873https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000973
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper